I agree. I suspect the whole “red shift = expansion” concept will be proven wrong at some point, which causes many other theories to fail too.

There are scientific theories that reject the Big Bang and postulate an infinite universe without a beginning. The story isn’t finished yet!

I am not a great student of all his work, however I do know he was an advocate for the so called hidden variable theories. These seemed to have been disproven via testing of Bell’s theorem (at least the local versions). I personally am satisfied with the Copenhagen interpretation and think that and the non-physical and even non-deterministic part of it actually fits well with Baha’u’llah’s writings. (I spent a bit of time on this in an article on medium https://hackernoon.com/plato-modern-physics-and-bahau-llah-ee3f8740fddc#.7u0pp84dd) I do know he was also very interested in the problem of consciousness and thought there was some link to QM..on this point he may be right.

Yes I read the article in question. Actually the LHC produces Ghosts all the time, they are called virtual particles and violate energy conservation on the level permitted by the uncertainty principal..but of course he is talking about consciousness. My short response to that is if we are ready to accept that a purely mathematical/intellectual object which permeates all space gives rise to an electron is it so stupid to believe something similar gives rise to consciousness?